2019年02月11日
Synergic metaphor viewed from “Snow Country” of Yasunari Kawabata - from “Nothingness and Creation” to “object achievement type cognitive development”6
5 Existential logic
The problem isn’t what is the presence, but I consider logically that something exists. Hanamura (2019)explains that “nothingness and creation” appears in the analysis of the language of modal quantity logic and the model structure.
There is a modal sentence called the Balcan principle. One part is the Balcan sentence ( (∀x) NPx → N(∀x) Px): N is necessity, P is existence) which means “if Q exists, Q already exists” to the model structure MQ <K,R,D>(K is a non-empty set of ‘possible world’, R is the reflexive relation with K, and D is the domain of individuality)and is the statement that dispels the creation from nothingness out of nowhere.
The other is the contrapositive Balcan sentence (N (∀x) Px → (∀x) NPx) that means “Q is existing and it is impossible that Q can’t exist in future” and denies the extinction to nothingness.
When the nothingness of Kawabata intersects with love, it sublates. In other words, it already exists and does so in future. Considering this, existing nothingness can adjust with the Balcan principle and the combination of “nothingness and creation” becomes possible. But what is it in terms of a scientific approach? To resolve the problem, I define Kawabata’s creation as the ideal form composed of theorem and formula, and see the characters as artificial and deformed processing.
花村嘉英(2019)「川端康成の「雪国」から見えてくるシナジーのメタファーとは−『無と創造』から『目的達成型の認知発達』へ」より translated by Yoshihisa Hanamura
The problem isn’t what is the presence, but I consider logically that something exists. Hanamura (2019)explains that “nothingness and creation” appears in the analysis of the language of modal quantity logic and the model structure.
There is a modal sentence called the Balcan principle. One part is the Balcan sentence ( (∀x) NPx → N(∀x) Px): N is necessity, P is existence) which means “if Q exists, Q already exists” to the model structure MQ <K,R,D>(K is a non-empty set of ‘possible world’, R is the reflexive relation with K, and D is the domain of individuality)and is the statement that dispels the creation from nothingness out of nowhere.
The other is the contrapositive Balcan sentence (N (∀x) Px → (∀x) NPx) that means “Q is existing and it is impossible that Q can’t exist in future” and denies the extinction to nothingness.
When the nothingness of Kawabata intersects with love, it sublates. In other words, it already exists and does so in future. Considering this, existing nothingness can adjust with the Balcan principle and the combination of “nothingness and creation” becomes possible. But what is it in terms of a scientific approach? To resolve the problem, I define Kawabata’s creation as the ideal form composed of theorem and formula, and see the characters as artificial and deformed processing.
花村嘉英(2019)「川端康成の「雪国」から見えてくるシナジーのメタファーとは−『無と創造』から『目的達成型の認知発達』へ」より translated by Yoshihisa Hanamura
【このカテゴリーの最新記事】
-
no image
-
no image
-
no image
-
no image
-
no image
この記事へのコメント
コメントを書く
この記事へのトラックバックURL
https://fanblogs.jp/tb/8549611
※ブログオーナーが承認したトラックバックのみ表示されます。
この記事へのトラックバック