シナジーのメタファー４

3 Synergic reading

　The output of the reading brain (linguistic cognition) seen as “nothingness and creation” slides aside during the input of informative cognition. This process needs to adjust to academic achievement by actual practice and qualification to prevent non-special lines (social science, informative science, biological science and medical science) from being kept intact as a black box (Hanamura 2015 and Hanamura 2017). Actually, there is a L format such as “culture and nourishment” and “law and energy” in cultural science and social science, but art and science do not have any L model or the like.
　However, in this paper I set the research format to the vertical axis as linguistic cognition and the horizontal as informative cognition on the L model because it is useful to merge the reading and writing brain. I can recognize what an author wanted to convey by writing because I can not only understand the language, but also my reading brain draws near to the writing brain of the author.
　When the research format is only vertical, I adjust the poles of art and culture or other minor subjects by sliding the cognitive ruler.
　When reading each sentence by L, I can find the goal gradually while creating the relational database. What does it show in the world of AI or the brain activity of healthy people? I believe that an uneducated AI will grow bit by bit in consideration of a specific purpose. In this sense, I could create the combination with Kawabata by imaging a person.
　Furthermore, the database of a novel is the relational research tool by which I can check against existing literature analyses and various science research. It is the combination between arts and informatics that humanities researchers should deal with besides corpus, parser, machine translation (memory) and quantitative linguistics.

花村嘉英（2019）「川端康成の「雪国」から見えてくるシナジーのメタファーとは−『無と創造』から『目的達成型の認知発達』へ」より　translated by Yoshihisa Hanamura