アフィリエイト広告を利用しています

広告

posted by fanblog

2020年02月12日

インフルエンザワクチンは他人への感染リスクを6倍

今シーズンにワクチン接種を受けていたインフルエンザ患者では、呼気からのエアロゾルの排出量が、受けていなかった人に比べて、6.3倍多かった。

この研究の実験方法の詳細は以下のようなものだ。

急性呼吸器症候群のボランティア 355人をスクリーニングし、その中のインフルエンザ感染が確認された 142人の患者から、1日目に 鼻咽頭からのサンプル採取、および 30分間の呼吸サンプルを提供してもらった。すべてのサンプルおよび培養された分泌物および微細エアロゾルについて、ウイルスの RNAコピー数を調査した。

その中の有効な培養物を用い、52種類(39%)の微細なエアロゾルと 150種類(89%)の分泌物から感染性ウイルスを回収した。(略) エアロゾルウイルス RNA は、体重指数および咳の数と正の相関があった。また、症状が現れてから日数が増えることとの相関には否定的な結果となった。

微細エアロゾルウイルス RNA はまた、現行シーズンおよび前シーズンの両方においてインフルエンザ・ワクチンの接種を有することと積極的に関連していた。また、感染性エアロゾルの発生にはくしゃみや咳は必要なかった。

今回の研究のこの発見が正確なものであり、また再現性のあるものであれば、インフルエンザ・ワクチンの接種は、それにより他の人にウイルスを感染させる可能性が高くなることを示す。あるいは、ワクチン接種を受けた人が周囲にいる環境では、インフルエンザ・ウイルスに曝露する確率が高くなるということにもなる。

過去にも、インフルエンザの観察研究報告を調べた 2010年のカナダの研究で、2008年から 2009年のシーズンの H1N1ワクチン接種が、2009年の春から秋の H1N1 の罹患リスクを 1.4倍から 2.5倍増加させていたことと関係していたことがが発表されたことがある。

また、インフルエンザだけではなく、MMR (新三種混合ワクチン)およびロタウイルス・クチンのような一般的なワクチンに関しても、ワクチン接種後のウイルスの流出および感染を含む医学的影響が文書化されている。


Flu Vaccine Increases Your Risk of Infecting Others by 6-Fold, Study Suggests

A provocative new study on flu virus transmission found that subjects had 6.3 times more aerosol shedding of flu virus particles if they received vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons

Vaccination is predicated on the rarely questioned belief that it confers bona fide immunity against targeted pathogens. This is why the terms vaccination and immunization are often used interchangeably, a disingenious semantic confusion that is rarely confronted or corrected. In the case of flu vaccine, certainty about this approximates religious faith, with the CDC taking on the role of the Church, conventional doctors the clergy, and the published literature Holy Scripture.

But what if the literature fails to support the orthodoxy? There are in, in fact, hundreds of examples of this. We have gathered a modest 500 studies which show the untintended, adverse effects of many vaccines outweigh their purported benefits, all of which you can view on our open access database on the topic here: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-all

The latest addition to this growing body of literature is found in a newly published article titled, "Infectious Virus Exhaled In Breath Of Symptomatic Seasonal Flu Cases," published in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science).

The study found that flu carriers exhale significant quantities of infectious influenza virus, and that counterintuitively, sneezing is rare and not important for influenza virus aerosolization; nor is coughing required to transmit these particles. Simply breathing will do. Additionally, the study found that males shed influenza viruses in greater quantity than females through fine aerosols, and women cough more frequently. But what is most salient about the study was the following finding:

6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.

For more details on the study design read the following:

We screened 355 symptomatic volunteers with acute respiratory illness and report 142 cases with confirmed influenza infection who provided 218 paired nasopharyngeal (NP) and 30-minute breath samples (coarse >5-μm and fine ≤5-μm fractions) on days 1–3 after symptom onset. We assessed viral RNA copy number for all samples and cultured NP swabs and fine aerosols.

We recovered infectious virus from 52 (39%) of the fine aerosols and 150 (89%) of the NP swabs with valid cultures. The geometric mean RNA copy numbers were 3.8 × 104/30-minutes fine-, 1.2 × 104/30-minutes coarse-aerosol sample, and 8.2 × 108 per NP swab. Fine- and coarse-aerosol viral RNA were positively associated with body mass index and number of coughs and negatively associated with increasing days since symptom onset in adjusted models.

Fine-aerosol viral RNA was also positively associated with having influenza vaccination for both the current and prior season. NP swab viral RNA was positively associated with upper respiratory symptoms and negatively associated with age but was not significantly associated with fine- or coarse-aerosol viral RNA or their predictors. Sneezing was rare, and sneezing and coughing were not necessary for infectious aerosol generation. Our observations suggest that influenza infection in the upper and lower airways are compartmentalized and independent.

Clearly, if this finding is accurate and reproducible, flu vaccination may actually make you more likely to infect others. Or worse, it may also make you more likely to contract influenza in the first place. For instance, a 2010 Canadian study which looked at 4 observational studies found that 2008-2009 H1N1 vaccination was associated with a 1.4 to 2.5 fold increased risk of medically attended H1N1 illness during the spring-summer 2009.

And this is only the tip of the iceberg. We have been reporting on the conspicuous lack of evidence for flu vaccine effectiveness (and safety) for over a decade, based largely on the underreported failure of the Cochrane Database Review to show them effective (and safe), despite hundreds of industry-funded studies that have attempted to do so. Learn more: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/shocking-lack-evidence-supporting-flu-vacc

Also, there are well-documented iatrogenic effects of common vaccines like MMR and Rotavirus Vaccines, which include viral shedding and infection following vaccination. In other words, there is a significant body of evidence that the vaccinated actually infect the un-vaccinated. Here are a few of our previous reports on this phenomena:

How Vaccinated Kids Infect The Non-Vaccinated
The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm
The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm
Millions of Children Infected with 'Vaccine Safety Experts' Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit
Rotavirus Vaccines Still Contaminated With Pig Virus
Polio Vaccines Now The #1 Cause of Polio Paralysis
Clearly, this undermines the ongoing campaign to identify non-vaccinating or anti-vaccine individuals and groups as a threat, or danger to others. Ironically, the very group being blamed for infecting others -- including by Bill Gates who declared non-vaccinators 'kill children' -- may become victims of being infected by vaccine-specific strains of viruses which are far worse than the natural/wild-type versions our species' immunity has evolved with over countless millenia.
この記事へのコメント
コメントを書く

お名前:

メールアドレス:


ホームページアドレス:

コメント: 必須項目

認証コード: 必須項目

※画像の中の文字を半角で入力してください。

※ブログオーナーが承認したコメントのみ表示されます。

この記事へのトラックバックURL
https://fanblogs.jp/tb/9626729
※ブログオーナーが承認したトラックバックのみ表示されます。

※言及リンクのないトラックバックは受信されません。

この記事へのトラックバック
検索
リンク集 Link Collection
<< 2020年07月 >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
最新記事

×

この広告は30日以上新しい記事の更新がないブログに表示されております。