mac快適化の最新記事

OS X El Capitanの性能チェック!Yosemiteと比較

El Capitanの性能は、システムレベルで性能が改善され、グラフィック50%向上!とWWDC2015で発表されていました。

今回、UnixBench5.1.3、peacekeeper.futuremark(ブラウザの性能チェック)、www.wirple.com(ブラウザのOpenGL性能チェック)を Yosemite 10.10.5とEl Capitan 10.11で比較してみました。

総評:OS X El Capitanがキビキビしているワケ
評価して判明した事実は、El Capitanは基礎体力ががっつり上がっています。
アプリやOSが動く上で重要な血管がとてもたくましくなりました。
=>だからEl Capitanはキビキビしている動作をしてくれます!

Intel HD GraphicsのビデオRAMが増強されています。
=>Yosemite 1024MB→El Capitan 1536MBになっていました。



評価環境
MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch Late2012
プロセッサ:2.5GHz Intel Core i5
メモリ:8GB
グラフィックス:Intel HD Graphics 4000

Yosemite 10.10.5
・Safari 9
・クロームは最新版
・カスペルスキー動作

El Capitan 10.11
・Safari 9
・クロームは最新版
・カスペルスキーは動いていない

El Capitan 導入時、クリーンインストールとなっため、裏で稼働しているサービスやディスクの使用状況などが著しく異なってしまいました。

評価ツール
UnixBench 5.1.3 + UnixBench5.1.3.mavericks.patch
ブラウザの性能:http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/
ブラウザのOpenGL性能:http://www.wirple.com/bmark/

Yosemite vs El Capitan 性能比較



評価項目性能詳細
UnixBench5.1.3
1コア System Benchmarks Index Score
Yosemite: 322.6
El Capitan:756.5
晴れ右斜め上2.3倍性能が向上しています。
主にSystem Call Overhead項目非常に良くなっています。
UnixBench5.1.3
4コア System Benchmarks Index Score
Yosemite:645.5
El Capitan:1671.7
晴れ右斜め上2.5倍性能が向上しています。
主にSystem Call Overhead項目非常に良くなっています。
peacekeeper. futuremark .com
Chromeテスト
Yosemite:3694
El Capitan:2963
雨右斜め下ある部分が大幅にダウンしているのではなく、評価項目一つ一つが下がっている感じです
peacekeeper. futuremark .com
Safariテスト
Yosemite:4471
El Capitan:4543
曇り同じバージョンSafari9なので大きな変化がありませんでした
Web Open GL評価
Chromeテスト
Yosemite:1763
El Capitan:2067
晴れ右斜め上20%ぐらいの性能アップという感じです
Canvas scoreが向上しています
Web Open GL評価
Safariテスト
Yosemite:2143
El Capitan:2360
晴れ右斜め上10%ぐらいの性能アップという感じです
Canvas scoreが向上しています

El Capitanは「システムコールのオーバーヘッドが少ない」OSに仕上がっています。
Webブラウザ上のグラフィックス性能は多少良くなっています。


以下、細かいデータとなります。興味がある方は覗いてみてください。

Yosemiteでのベンチマーク結果


Yosemite-bench.png(クリックで拡大します)

Yosemite UnixBench 5.1.3


========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: mymac.local: Darwin
OS: Darwin -- 14.5.0 -- Darwin Kernel Version 14.5.0: Wed Jul 29 02:26:53 PDT 2015; root:xnu-2782.40.9~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="US-ASCII", collate=)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
8:17 up 5 days, 8:17, 3 users, load averages: 2.07 2.41 2.41; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 木 10 01 2015 08:17:24 - 08:46:31
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27779251.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4822.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 507.3 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 565384.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 169449.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1610847.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 987976.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 130050.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2721.9 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 51.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3.5 lpm (68.9 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 477051.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27779251.3 2380.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4822.7 876.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 507.3 118.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 565384.2 1427.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 169449.5 1023.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1610847.7 2777.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 987976.3 794.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 130050.5 325.1
Process Creation 126.0 2721.9 216.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 51.8 12.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3.5 5.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 477051.2 318.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 322.6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 木 10 01 2015 08:46:31 - 09:16:18
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 61111958.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 18286.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1178.7 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1074404.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 304468.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2813312.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2359902.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 415967.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5599.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 53.8 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4.3 lpm (62.7 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 856678.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 61111958.8 5236.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 18286.2 3324.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1178.7 274.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1074404.9 2713.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 304468.1 1839.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2813312.1 4850.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2359902.5 1897.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 415967.4 1039.9
Process Creation 126.0 5599.7 444.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 53.8 12.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4.3 7.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 856678.5 571.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 645.5

Yosemite Chrome http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/


Chrome
3694 Points
Version infoMozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.101 Safari/537.36Comment
Suite
Result
Rendering
74.42
renderGrid01
136.91 fps
renderGrid02
121.73 fps
renderGrid03
21.94 fps
renderPhysics
83.91 fps
HTML5 Capabilities
7/7
webglSphere
Yes (59.91 fps)
videoPosterSupport
Yes
videoCodecH264
Yes
videoCodecTheora
Yes
videoCodecWebM
Yes
workerContrast01
Yes (4443.83 ops)
workerContrast02
Yes (4881.58 ops)
gamingSpitfire
Yes (50.45 fps)
HTML5 Canvas
31.72
experimentalRipple01
48.50 fps
experimentalRipple02
20.74 fps
Data
63070.35
arrayCombined
12293.50 ops
arrayWeighted
323575.00 ops
DOM operations
16144.98
domGetElements
1749778.50 ops
domDynamicCreationCreateElement
24809.00 ops
domDynamicCreationInnerHTML
33930.00 ops
domJQueryAttributeFilters
4651.00 ops
domJQueryBasicFilters
1921.50 ops
domJQueryBasics
3729.00 ops
domJQueryContentFilters
3494.50 ops
domJQueryHierarchy
7203.50 ops
domQueryselector
60319.00 ops
Text parsing
286142.56
stringChat
122719.50 ops
stringDetectBrowser
754197.50 ops
stringFilter
58790.50 ops
stringValidateForm
959946.50 ops
stringWeighted
367248.00 ops

Yosemite Safari http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/


Safari
4471 Points
Version infoMozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_5) AppleWebKit/601.1.56 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/9.0 Safari/601.1.56Comment
Suite
Result
Rendering
73.94
renderGrid01
120.83 fps
renderGrid02
119.64 fps
renderGrid03
18.62 fps
renderPhysics
111.04 fps
HTML5 Capabilities
5/7
webglSphere
Yes (59.93 fps)
videoPosterSupport
Yes
videoCodecH264
Yes
videoCodecTheora
N/A
videoCodecWebM
N/A
workerContrast01
Yes (13295.35 ops)
workerContrast02
Yes (16032.63 ops)
gamingSpitfire
Yes (51.05 fps)
HTML5 Canvas
47.91
experimentalRipple01
67.40 fps
experimentalRipple02
34.05 fps
Data
70987.25
arrayCombined
17780.00 ops
arrayWeighted
283419.00 ops
DOM operations
39408.38
domGetElements
2828007.00 ops
domDynamicCreationCreateElement
38453.50 ops
domDynamicCreationInnerHTML
34640.00 ops
domJQueryAttributeFilters
23749.50 ops
domJQueryBasicFilters
2870.00 ops
domJQueryBasics
18786.50 ops
domJQueryContentFilters
4974.00 ops
domJQueryHierarchy
33741.50 ops
domQueryselector
283172.00 ops
Text parsing
180389.88
stringChat
75898.50 ops
stringDetectBrowser
474483.50 ops
stringFilter
56988.00 ops
stringValidateForm
669994.00 ops
stringWeighted
138916.00 ops

Yosemite Chrome http://www.wirple.com/bmark/


Chrome
Canvas score - Test 1: 388 - Test 2: 793
WebGL score - Test 1: 317 - Test 2: 265
Total score: 1763
Your results compared to other users:
You score better than 86% of all users so far!
You score better than 61% of the people who use the same browser and OS!

Yosemite Safari http://www.wirple.com/bmark/


Safari9
Canvas score - Test 1: 346 - Test 2: 485
WebGL score - Test 1: 671 - Test 2: 641
Total score: 2143
Your results compared to other users:
You score better than 91% of all users so far!
You score better than 87% of the people who use the same browser and OS!

El Capitan 10.11でのベンチマーク結果


OSX El Capitan-bench.png(クリックで拡大します)

El Capitan 10.11 UnixBench 5.1.3


========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: mymac.local: Darwin
OS: Darwin -- 15.0.0 -- Darwin Kernel Version 15.0.0: Wed Aug 26 16:57:32 PDT 2015; root:xnu-3247.1.106~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="US-ASCII", collate=)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz (0.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
12:07 up 16:49, 2 users, load averages: 1.49 1.91 2.42; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 月 10 05 2015 12:07:38 - 12:35:55
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28872657.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4993.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 539.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 569370.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 162173.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1549586.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 922790.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 114400.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3001.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3164.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 766.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1030594.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28872657.0 2474.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4993.8 908.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 539.7 125.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 569370.8 1437.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 162173.3 979.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1549586.9 2671.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 922790.3 741.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 114400.7 286.0
Process Creation 126.0 3001.5 238.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3164.4 746.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 766.6 1277.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1030594.6 687.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 756.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 月 10 05 2015 12:35:55 - 13:04:20
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 65400336.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 18378.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1319.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1078504.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 310326.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2790942.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2259034.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 470156.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6329.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6049.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 839.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2362637.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 65400336.8 5604.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 18378.9 3341.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 1319.8 306.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1078504.4 2723.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 310326.7 1875.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2790942.5 4812.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2259034.8 1815.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 470156.7 1175.4
Process Creation 126.0 6329.6 502.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6049.2 1426.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 839.5 1399.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2362637.6 1575.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1671.7

El Capitan 10.11 Chrome http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/


Chrome
2963 Points
Version infoMozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.101 Safari/537.36Comment
Suite
Result
Rendering
65.75
renderGrid01
167.13 fps
renderGrid02
138.88 fps
renderGrid03
11.75 fps
renderPhysics
68.51 fps
HTML5 Capabilities
7/7
webglSphere
Yes (59.91 fps)
videoPosterSupport
Yes
videoCodecH264
Yes
videoCodecTheora
Yes
videoCodecWebM
Yes
workerContrast01
Yes (3406.93 ops)
workerContrast02
Yes (4622.18 ops)
gamingSpitfire
Yes (51.33 fps)
HTML5 Canvas
25.26
experimentalRipple01
37.63 fps
experimentalRipple02
16.95 fps
Data
48322.03
arrayCombined
9740.00 ops
arrayWeighted
239735.00 ops
DOM operations
12296.49
domGetElements
1509836.50 ops
domDynamicCreationCreateElement
19783.00 ops
domDynamicCreationInnerHTML
24634.00 ops
domJQueryAttributeFilters
3540.00 ops
domJQueryBasicFilters
1316.50 ops
domJQueryBasics
3331.00 ops
domJQueryContentFilters
2147.50 ops
domJQueryHierarchy
5566.50 ops
domQueryselector
47071.50 ops
Text parsing
231412.03
stringChat
100206.00 ops
stringDetectBrowser
560188.50 ops
stringFilter
51568.00 ops
stringValidateForm
806071.50 ops
stringWeighted
284412.00 ops

El Capitan 10.11 Safari http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/


Safari
4543 Points
Version infoMozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11) AppleWebKit/601.1.56 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/9.0 Safari/601.1.56Comment
Suite
Result
Rendering
72.04
renderGrid01
120.63 fps
renderGrid02
119.57 fps
renderGrid03
16.61 fps
renderPhysics
112.43 fps
HTML5 Capabilities
5/7
webglSphere
Yes (59.95 fps)
videoPosterSupport
Yes
videoCodecH264
Yes
videoCodecTheora
N/A
videoCodecWebM
N/A
workerContrast01
Yes (14146.44 ops)
workerContrast02
Yes (16353.28 ops)
gamingSpitfire
Yes (50.71 fps)
HTML5 Canvas
49.25
experimentalRipple01
67.92 fps
experimentalRipple02
35.71 fps
Data
70567.28
arrayCombined
18175.00 ops
arrayWeighted
273988.50 ops
DOM operations
41195.09
domGetElements
2993833.00 ops
domDynamicCreationCreateElement
38288.50 ops
domDynamicCreationInnerHTML
36488.50 ops
domJQueryAttributeFilters
25250.50 ops
domJQueryBasicFilters
3035.00 ops
domJQueryBasics
19826.50 ops
domJQueryContentFilters
5175.50 ops
domJQueryHierarchy
35732.00 ops
domQueryselector
290718.50 ops
Text parsing
187667.59
stringChat
78670.00 ops
stringDetectBrowser
522195.50 ops
stringFilter
57728.00 ops
stringValidateForm
727748.50 ops
stringWeighted
134876.50 ops

El Capitan 10.11 Chrome http://www.wirple.com/bmark/


Chrome
Canvas score - Test 1: 416 - Test 2: 909
WebGL score - Test 1: 376 - Test 2: 366
Total score: 2067
Your results compared to other users:
You score better than 91% of all users so far!
You score better than 70% of the people who use the same browser and OS!

El Capitan 10.11 Safari http://www.wirple.com/bmark/


Safari9
Canvas score - Test 1: 409 - Test 2: 622
WebGL score - Test 1: 729 - Test 2: 600
Total score: 2360
Your results compared to other users:
You score better than 93% of all users so far!
You score better than 87% of the people who use the same browser and OS!




 

 

OS X El Capitanの性能チェック!Yosemiteと比較
サブコンテンツ

コメント

comments powered by Disqus

2018.12.15 macyarounanoka(管理者)のメールアドレスを失って、disqusにログインできなくなっていました。 そのためmacyarounanoka-2で返信するように変わっています。 エキサイトのフリーメールアドレス使っていたことに気がつけませんでした。 ちょっとやってしまいました感がありますOrz。 記事へのコメントはいままで通りdisqusでお願いします。 個別のお問い合わせはお問い合わせからお願いします。
2013.8.19 DISQUS(外部コメントサービス)の利用を開始しました。
Facebook, google, Twitter等のアカウントで投稿可能です。


↓↓Office365 Soloは年間契約がお得です↓↓
Microsoft Public Affiliate Program (JP)

  • 祝!初マック(mac book retina 13インチ)!retina美しいです^^マックに関係するTips、情報、はまったことの解決策等
  • Mac野郎なのか
  • プロフィール

このページの先頭へ